The R03 funding mechanism is offered by most all of the NIH Institutes and Centers and serves as an excellent first Research R grant award to enable investigators to obtain pilot data needed for a R01 or other major grant award.
Applicants should clearly state that they have the appropriate resources to conduct the research, such as adequate equipment and laboratory space. When possible, include letters of commitment for these resources.
Understand the level of resources needed to compete. Conduct an organizational assessment. Consider whether the available equipment and facilities are adequate and whether the environment is conducive to the research. Independence and Institutional Support: This is important for all investigators, but particularly for new and early stage investigators or those who are early in their independent careers: Provide reviewers evidence that you have the appropriate experience and training to lead and manage the research project.
Letters of reference and institutional commitment are important. Mention any start-up funds, support for a technician, etc.
This is a positive indicator of institutional commitment to the peer reviewers. Determine the expertise needed for your research study team individuals, collaborating organizations, resources, etc. Most scientific work requires collaboration among researchers, and NIH is dedicated to fostering such relationships.
Include letters of commitment in your application that clearly spell out the roles of the collaborators.
The grant application should contain a signed letter from each collaborator to the applicant that lists the contribution he or she intends to make and his or her commitment to the work. These letters are often the primary assurance the reviewers have that this work will in fact be done.
If you are planning to apply with multiple-principal investigatorsthen take the following into consideration: The format, peer review and administration of applications submitted with multiple PIs do have some significant differences from the traditional single-PI application.
Therefore, it is essential to consider all aspects of the funding mechanism before applying, regardless of the type of research proposal to be submitted. All applicants proposing team science efforts are strongly encouraged to contact their NIH program officials at the earliest possible date to discuss the appropriateness submitting with multiple-PIs for the support of their research.
Reviewers with expertise in your area will best recognize the potential for your research to advance science. Review the rosters of the scientific review groups to get your application assigned to a study section where some members have the appropriate expertise to review your project.
Specify your assignment request in a cover letter or in the assignment request form included in your application. Follow the application guide instructions as to what you may and may not request, and what information should go in the cover letter vs the assignment request form.
Only NIH staff with a need to know are provided access to your assignment request and cover letter. Reviewers to not access to them.
This is an opportunity to also provide names of any reviewers that may have a conflict of interest and should not be considered as reviewers of your application. It is important to match your area of research with the areas reviewed by the study section.
Determine whether you qualify as a new investigator based on the NIH definition of new investigator. NIH staff is on the lookout for new and early stage investigators. Check your eRA Commons account and ensure your funding history and the date of your residency or terminal degree are accurate to ensure that you are identified appropriately as a new or early stage investigator.
It is to your advantage to identify yourself as a new investigator because reviewers are instructed to give special consideration to new investigators.
Reviewers will give greater consideration to the proposed approach, rather than the track record. First-time applicants may have less preliminary data and fewer publications than more seasoned investigators, and NIH reviewers understand this.
Reviewers instead place more emphasis on how the investigator has demonstrated that he or she is truly independent of any former mentors, whether he or she has some of his or her own resources and institutional support, and whether he or she is able to independently lead the research.
Foreign applicants can learn more at our Information for Foreign Applicants and Grantees page.NIH does not award grants directly to individuals; grants are awarded to institutions that are responsible for the administration, especially the financial aspects, of the grant award.
Grant applications must be approved and signed by a responsible institutional official. Our workbooks are guides to successful grantsmanship. Many of our clients regard theirs as the ultimate authority on proposal writing.
That level of regard stems from the practical, step-by-step approach that is offered, which you can sample by clicking on the cover of any of the versions – NIH, NSF, USDA-NIFA or Any Other Agency.
Mar 30, · Many NIH Institutes put out guides and tip sheets on their Web sites. These guides can be useful resources. Here are just a few. All About Grants Tutorials - Including information to help investigators plan and write grant applications and manage their awards.
Applying for an NHGRI Grant; Choosing an Appropriate NIH Funding Instrument and Funding Mechanism (MS Word - KB). Location Change for Bid Board In accordance with FAR (a) (2), the Bid Board for OA, NIDA, NIH, has been relocated from Building 31 on the NIH campus, to the first floor of Executive Boulevard, Rockville, Maryland Grant writing workshops, courses, seminars, the best grant training helping you win federal, foundation, NIH, education, science, environment grants.
One, Two and. Some useful samples and examples that are part of the grant application from NIAID and NIH, including sample applications and summaries, data sharing, and model organism sharing plans.