How to Write a Summary of an Article?
Singer would have a hard time trying to implement his solution in reality since it feels like elimination of luxuries has the potential to stop all the cultural progress in world and, even more importantly, deny people the right to enjoy something other than simple meals. The Singer Solution to World Poverty By PETER SINGER Illustrations by ROSS MacDONALD. The Australian philosopher Peter Singer, who later this month begins teaching at Princeton University, is perhaps the world's most controversial ethicist. Nov 08, · “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” by Peter Singer prescribes a method for eradicating the suffering of poverty stricken children; everyone must donate surplus earned money over the amount necessary for basic living; thirty thousand dollars.
He presents two hypothetical situations to support his argument. Singer uses these two situations as analogies to the choices Americans could make. He believes that if we can prevent something bad from happening without sacrificing anything of comparable The singer solution importance, then we ought to do so.
Therefore, he wants Americans to donate money to organizations overseas for the needy by not spending that money on personal luxuries. He showed that this amount of money could truly save a life and I believe it would be hard to find someone who would object to giving this relatively small amount of money if it meant saving a life.
However, Singer ended his argument in wanting everyone to donate every cent of his or her extra money to charity. This is a large demand that does not convince people to want to donate their money.
At least for me, as much as I care for others who need financial aid, I would not be willing to give all my extra wealth away, especially if I earned that extra wealth. What made this specific argument weak was that Singer did not provide any real persuasion as to why we should be giving all our surplus wealth away.
Everyone has a different perspective on what he or she considers something to be a luxury or necessity. Also, everyone has the right to control his or her own wealth. Many organizations take in some of the money for administrative costs, and etcetera.
Nowadays, technology shares a huge portion of our expenditures, but since technology that makes our lives easier and more convenient is considered a luxury, will there be any need to have these technologies anymore when we can only afford necessities for ourselves?
Will even more poverty arise from their power? People are always striving to earn more money so they can afford beyond their necessities, but there may be a lack of motivation to strive for better if they know what they are working for will only be shared by others.
At the end, this will backfire the entire plan when nobody has surplus wealth. How much would you be willing to sacrifice for the survival of another, particularly a stranger?
Singer uses utilitarian philosophy to reduce our arguments for not donating to the bare structure. Dora sells a boy for his organs and because the boy is in such close contact with her, she cannot bear the guilt and is remorseful. Bob, on the other had, invests in a Bugatti and lets the train run over a boy instead of his car.
While everyone can agree it was wrong, he did what he did because of the fact that he did not have close contact with the boy and could easily ignore him.
It is analogous to how the hundreds of millions capable of donating dollars to charity and saving the children from the organ harvesters and phantom, unmanned trains of the world. Bob and the average reader are in the same category.
In another point he makes, Bob would only lose his car, as opposed to a limb. We only have to pay dollars notdollars. In all seriousness Singer had a very legitimate argument.
The western world has the surplus funds and resources to end the atrocities of the world and bridge the prosperity gap. So why is there hunger, poverty, and human misery in this day and age? According to Singer, and me, its because no one is in direct contact with what they have the potential to change.
No one is picking up a boy and selling him directly. No one is saving their Bugatti in this side of the world. We are the hoarders and forgoing our luxury is out of the question for many of us. He asks that people donate money to charity and for as little as two hundred dollars, you could be saving someones life.
The situation he presents shows the different opinions of human beings and although this is a good example, it is not that simple. Financially speaking, many people can not afford to live as comfortably as they would probably like. There is always a struggle and a feeling of needing more money and to be able to give away money that is earned and worked hard for is a difficult decision for most.
I feel that poverty, hunger, and even homelessness are ongoing problems that will never be solved.A Critique For “The Singer Solution To World Poverty” In the essay “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” philosopher Peter Singer addresses the issue of poverty by suggesting Americans give away most of their income to aid those in need.
Singer believes that withholding income is the equivalence of letting a child starve to death. Singer would have a hard time trying to implement his solution in reality since it feels like elimination of luxuries has the potential to stop all the cultural progress in world and, even more importantly, deny people the right to enjoy something other than simple meals.
The Singer Solution to World Poverty remember Rhetorical Devices. ETHOS credibility of the author PATHOS emotional appeal LOGOS logical appeal Example- Actor Will Smith at the Live 8 Concert () APPEALING TO: PATHOS: Will Smith wears a Nelson Mandela shirt which elicits an emotional appeal from the audience.
Read The Singer Solution free essay and over 88, other research documents. The Singer Solution. Hailey Nichols The Singer Solution In Peter Singer’s mind, the 19, people that die per day from illnesses attributed to /5(1).
karaoke leslutinsduphoenix.com solution."new'. country # # # # # karaoke cdg. singers solution. any copying or altering of singers solution products is in violation. September 5, The Singer Solution to World Poverty By PETER SINGER Illustrations by ROSS MacDONALD. The Australian philosopher Peter Singer, who later this month begins teaching at Princeton University, is perhaps the world's most controversial ethicist.